Want to encourage young people to be lifelong voters? Say yes to Prop. 18
Passage of Proposition 18 will allow 17-year-olds to vote in primary and special elections, provided they will be 18 at the time of the general election.
At least 18 other states already have passed similar measures, and it’s past time California did as well.
As first-time voters, young people should have the opportunity to participate in the entire election cycle. Otherwise, we’re sending a message that primary elections don’t really matter, and it’s OK to just show up for the main event.
Unfortunately, that attitude is all too prevalent; voter participation in primaries is notoriously low. This year, only 47% of California’s registered voters and 38% of all eligible voters cast ballots in the primary — and that was considered a good turnout.
Allowing 17-year-olds to vote elevates the importance of the primary, and hopefully will lead to a lifelong habit of voting in every election.
Besides, there are no rational arguments against this.
A ballot rebuttal signed by Jon Coupal of the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, among others, argues that 17-year-olds lack real world experience.
“Most have not had to work to support themselves, nor make their own way to pay for taxes, rent, food, etc.”
Based on that argument, it appears Coupal and company would just as soon turn back the clock and raise the voting age to 21.
Opponents also claim that 17-year-olds will be unduly influenced by their teachers, especially when it comes to voting on school bonds.
Not only is this a cynical ploy to attempt to defeat school bonds, it’s also an insult to the intellectual capabilities of young people.
Young voters have the most at stake in elections — after all, they’ll be living with the consequences far into the future — and we need to do everything we can to encourage their participation from the start.
The Tribune urges a yes vote on Proposition 18.
BEHIND THE STORY
MOREWhy we make endorsements
Making endorsements during election season is an important role for newspaper editorial boards, including The Tribune Editorial Board. Elections are key to determining the future of San Luis Obispo County, and through endorsements we share our opinion of the qualifications of the candidates and the merits of ballot measures.
For more about our process, click the arrow on the right.
Who decides?
Opinion editors at McClatchy’s five California newspapers — The Sacramento Bee, Fresno Bee, Modesto Bee, Merced Sun-Star and The Tribune — analyze pros and cons of each statewide proposition, but may not necessarily agree on a recommendation. The Tribune’s final endorsement decisions are made by Editor Joe Tarica and Opinion Editor Stephanie Finucane.
How do we decide?
McClatchy’s California opinion editors hold Zoom meetings with the primary supporters and opponents of each ballot measure. Each side has the opportunity to introduce the measure, followed by a question and answer period that often leads to spirited debate between the two sides.
We also review background material, including relevant studies, public opinion surveys, advertising and campaign statements, and we consider who is supporting and opposing the measure.
Tell us what you think
If you disagree (or agree) with our endorsements, share your thoughts by writing a letter to the editor (200-word maximum). Email your submissions to letters@thetribunenews.com.