San Luis Obispo Tribune Logo

Viewpoint: What is really fair in the Orcutt area annexation? | San Luis Obispo Tribune

×
  • E-edition
  • Home
    • Customer Service
    • Contact Us
    • Mobile & Apps
    • Submit an Event
    • Buy Photos
    • News in Education
    • FAQ
    • Activate Digital Subscription
    • Manage Account
    • Newsletters

    • News
    • Local
    • Crime
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Investigations
    • California
    • California Weed
    • Nation & World
    • Lottery
    • Weather
    • Weird News
    • Submit a News Tip
    • Columns
    • Photos from the Vault
    • Weather Watch
    • Joetopia
    • That's SLO Weird
    • Sports
    • Outdoors
    • High School
    • Cal Poly
    • MLB
    • MLB Scores & Stats
    • NBA
    • NBA Scores & Stats
    • NFL
    • NFL Scores & Stats
    • Politics
    • The California Influencer Series
  • Business
    • Living
    • Food & Drink
    • Wine & Beer
    • Home & Garden
    • Travel
    • Columns
    • Linda Lewis Griffith
    • Pet Tales
    • Entertainment
    • Arts & Culture
    • Comics
    • Puzzles & Games
    • Horoscopes
    • Restaurants
    • Events Calendar
    • Movies
    • Music
    • TV
    • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Viewpoints
    • Influencers Opinion
    • Editorial Cartoons
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Submit a Letter
    • Columnists
    • Tom Fulks
    • Andrea Seastrand
  • Obituaries
  • The Cambrian

  • Contests
  • Today's Circulars
  • Classifieds
  • Jobs
  • Moonlighting
  • Cars
    • Homes
    • Real Estate Weekly
  • Place An Ad

  • About Us
  • Work For Us
  • Mobile & Apps

Letters to the Editor

Viewpoint: What is really fair in the Orcutt area annexation?

The Righetti and Phil Gray families; Ernest and Julie Jones; and Chuck A. Pratt

    ORDER REPRINT →

July 23, 2011 08:45 PM

The idea of making one’s voice heard is a great one. But when the voice drowns out common sense and fairness and relies on misinformation and emotion to be heard, that’s an idea gone bad.

Such is the case with the Orcutt Area Annexation, a 14-year effort to annex 231 acres into the city of San Luis Obispo.

There are 13 property owners within the footprint of the site. Nine of them represent 92.6 percent of the acreage. They have been working for years to bring their land into the city and support the annexation.

The annexation has dozens of benefits, with hiking and biking trails, open space preservation, affordable housing and improved police and fire protection leading the way. All good ideas.

SIGN UP

Sign Up and Save

Get six months of free digital access to The Tribune

SUBSCRIBE WITH GOOGLE

#ReadLocal

The bad idea: that at the eleventh hour and a year after the city has approved the annexation and the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) has given it preliminary approval, four protesting property owners and a handful of renters are seeking to derail our effort. Renters with no vested interest in the property can affect how we longtime landowners proceed.

That’s how the process works, and whether it makes rational sense or not, that process is now allowing this small group of opponents to sabotage a well-thought-out plan. We are extremely dismayed by this turn of events.

We have invested hundreds of hours in public meetings. We have collaborated with city staff and council members to develop a proposal that’s a point of pride for all of us and represents the best in Smart Growth principles and future planning.

After years of public scrutiny, our City Council and LAFCO approved the annexation, and it is in the final stages of the process.

We are not clear why we are now being scuttled by a small but vocal group of opponents who claim the process is unfair and that the city, partnering with “developers,” is threatening to take away property and force them off the land.

These owners and their renters are using sweeping overstatements and misinformation to charge that the annexation will force undue hardship on them. Their claims are misleading and untrue.

The fact is that when one of the loudest protesters bought their property, it was already identified in the city’s General Plan as a future annexation area. The decision to now protest the city-approved annexation is something akin to moving next to an airport and then deciding you don’t like the noise from the planes.

These objections could kill what we believe to be a great plan. Annexing the Orcutt Area is good for San Luis Obispo, offering 80 acres of permanent open space, parkland and ball fields, 7.5 miles of hiking and biking paths and trails and much-needed affordable housing. City public safety and public transportation services will finally serve the area.

This annexation offers a means of preventing sprawl and uneven development — problems that have crept onto our city’s fringe for too many years. Annexation enables our city to more effectively manage environmental impacts and growth and improve transportation and circulation problems.

But perhaps the most important fact of annexation, and one not mentioned by opponents, is that it allows current property owners to control their own future. No one can be forced to change current land use. Neither the city nor neighboring property owners can force owners to do anything with their own individual properties. Renters concerned with displacement have only their landlords to deal with. Individual property rights do not change with annexation, so where is the threat? There is none.

We believe the only threat is to us. We have been paying mortgages and property taxes (in some cases on property owned for more than half a century) and taking care of our land, and now we are being denied the right to make reasonable use of it.

The planning process for the Orcutt Area annexation has been a good one.

There have been dozens of opportunities for comment in this process. As a result of those voices and opinions, a plan that is good for the city, for property owners and renters has emerged.

Let’s hope that fairness and common sense will prevail so that annexation can proceed.

The Phil Gray and Righetti families, Ernest and Julie Jones and Chuck A. Pratt are Orcutt area landowners.

  Comments  

Videos

Tour SLO’s aging, cramped police station with chief Deanna Cantrell

Watch crews make emergency repairs to levee on Highway 37

View More Video

Trending Stories

CMC officer shoots intruder trying to break into his Los Osos home, sheriff says

February 15, 2019 09:52 AM

We’re replacing ‘Non Sequitur’ comic after artist snuck in profanity against Trump

February 15, 2019 10:52 AM

These 13 people were convicted of murder in SLO County. Some could go free under new law

February 15, 2019 09:52 AM

Payless ShoeSource is closing all of its stores — including 2 in SLO County

February 15, 2019 06:20 PM

Paso man killed in traffic stop was suicidal, pulled BB gun on deputies, DA report says

February 15, 2019 02:21 PM

Read Next

Letters to the editor: Readers weigh in on Democrat’s vision, Laurel Creek

Letters to the Editor

Letters to the editor: Readers weigh in on Democrat’s vision, Laurel Creek

We have a socialistic Democratic Party made up of a group of elitists who hide their need for big experiences under a veneer of false compassion, says Larry Bargenquast of Paso Robles.

KEEP READING

Sign Up and Save

#ReadLocal

Get six months of free digital access to The Tribune

SUBSCRIBE WITH GOOGLE

MORE LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

Letters to the editor: Reader opinions on mail-in ballots, Diablo Canyon

Letters to the Editor

Letters to the editor: Reader opinions on mail-in ballots, Diablo Canyon

February 09, 2019 04:06 PM
Letters to the editor: Reader’s opinions on socialism, Roosevelt statue

Letters to the Editor

Letters to the editor: Reader’s opinions on socialism, Roosevelt statue

February 08, 2019 03:56 PM
Letters to the editor: Readers weigh in on Diablo Canyon, San Luis Ranch

Letters to the Editor

Letters to the editor: Readers weigh in on Diablo Canyon, San Luis Ranch

February 08, 2019 04:10 PM
Letters to the editor: Reader’s opinions on Cal Poly salaries, government shutdown

Letters to the Editor

Letters to the editor: Reader’s opinions on Cal Poly salaries, government shutdown

February 01, 2019 04:35 PM
Letters to the editor: Readers discuss wall compromise, Trump tragicomedy

Letters to the Editor

Letters to the editor: Readers discuss wall compromise, Trump tragicomedy

January 26, 2019 06:34 PM
Letters to the editor: Readers say SLO City Council is ineffective, driving away residents

Letters to the Editor

Letters to the editor: Readers say SLO City Council is ineffective, driving away residents

January 25, 2019 03:21 PM
Take Us With You

Real-time updates and all local stories you want right in the palm of your hand.

Icon for mobile apps

San Luis Obispo Tribune App

View Newsletters

Subscriptions
  • Start a Subscription
  • Customer Service
  • eEdition
  • Vacation Hold
  • Pay Your Bill
  • Rewards
Learn More
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletters
  • News in Education
  • Archives
Advertising
  • Place a Classified Ad
  • Advertise with Us
  • Local Deals
  • Public Notices
Copyright
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service


Back to Story