Money Research Collective’s editorial team solely created this content. Opinions are their own, but compensation and in-depth research determine where and how companies may appear. Many featured companies advertise with us. How we make money.
I Plan to Claim Social Security at Full Retirement Age Just to Invest the Money. Is This Genius?
By Pete Grieve MONEY RESEARCH COLLECTIVE
Experts weigh in on how to decide when to claim Social Security benefits and whether it’s smart to accelerate that timeline to invest.
Does conventional wisdom about waiting to claim Social Security overlook the potential upside of investing benefits claimed earlier?
It’s a question financial professionals often hear from their clients, and one a Reddit user raises in a recent thread wondering whether they would be better off claiming Social Security at 67 — the full retirement age — instead of 70 because they could invest the money.
Pet protection: See Lemonade’s pet insurance options — save and protect your cat or dog from high vet bills.
Typically, claiming at 70 is advantageous compared to claiming at 67 if a person goes on to live to past a breakeven age (generally in the early 80s), experts say. However, the user theorizes that if they can earn a “modest” return by investing, the math changes.
In that case, “the only way I won’t be better off taking Social Security at age 67 is if I live past 90!” the post reads. “I’m healthy, but that’s still actuarially unlikely (<50% chance even for 67 yr old non smoker in excellent health, according to [an] online actuarial calculator).”
So, how should you decide when to claim Social Security benefits, and is it smart to accelerate that timeline to invest the money?
Free stock opportunity: Get up to $1,000 in stock with a new, funded SoFi Invest account.
Expert advice: Think carefully about this strategy
The post raises an important point: If a person is able to earn a return on Social Security benefits claimed at an earlier age, it can affect the calculus around the optimal claiming age.
The decision is complex, and several factors are often overlooked. Joseph White, a portfolio manager at Johnson Investment Counsel, explains that delaying Social Security generally nets individuals an 8%-per-year benefit increase. Crucially, that increase is indexed to the inflation rate with the annual Social Security cost-of-living adjustment (COLA), which often comes in at about 3%.
“Perhaps the most critical flaw that I see people make with their assumptions is that the 8% investment return they believe they need to make this work is nominal, meaning NOT inflation-adjusted,” White writes in an email. If someone fails to account for the COLA, their calculations will be off: The true investment return they would need to make claiming at 67 beneficial would actually be higher.
Also, around retirement age, investors typically shift their portfolios to limit risk exposure and protect their savings, often at the expense of higher annual returns. Investment returns are still part of the consideration, but that 8% increase plus the COLA may beat a modest gain from investing.
Save smarter: Take control of your money with the Rocket Money budgeting app.
No matter how someone plans to use the money, one major challenge in deciding when to claim Social Security is the unknown of life expectancy. Delaying benefits generally pays off for individuals who live longer.
“If they are truly investing those payments, claiming earlier does become more relatively attractive and moves that breakeven age out a bit further,” White explains.
But in most cases, benefits are not exactly “extra” money to invest, says Matt Coursen, a relationship manager at Plante Moran Financial Advisors.
“Social Security was designed to replace roughly 40% of retirement income, and many retirees rely on that monthly check to cover basic living expenses,” Coursen adds.
That’s why the Reddit user, and anyone else considering this strategy, needs to think twice before claiming the benefits early.
Can't Miss Deals
- Check out Robinhood's online trading platform and get the first trade on them
- Get your first year of AARP for just $15
- 74% off NordVPN right now — plus an Amazon gift card
Pete Grieve is a New York-based reporter who covers personal finance news. At Money, Pete covers trending stories that affect Americans’ wallets on topics including car buying, insurance, housing, credit cards, retirement and taxes. He studied political science and photography at the University of Chicago, where he was editor-in-chief of The Chicago Maroon. Pete began his career as a professional journalist in 2019. Prior to joining Money, he was a health reporter for Spectrum News in Ohio, where he wrote digital stories and appeared on TV to provide coverage to a statewide audience. He has also written for the San Francisco Chronicle, the Chicago Sun-Times and CNN Politics. Pete received extensive journalism training through Report for America, a nonprofit organization that places reporters in newsrooms to cover underreported issues and communities, and he attended the annual Investigative Reporters and Editors conference in 2021. Pete has discussed his reporting in interviews with outlets including the Columbia Journalism Review and WBEZ (Chicago's NPR station). He’s been a panelist at the Chicago Headline Club’s FOIA Fest and he received the Institute on Political Journalism’s $2,500 Award for Excellence in Collegiate Reporting in 2017. An essay he wrote for Grey City magazine was published in a 2020 book, Remembering J. Z. Smith: A Career and its Consequence.