Opinion

Sunday, Sep. 13, 2009

Dan Walters: Legislature lives up -- or down -- to its reputation

| dwalters@sacbee.com
Comments (0) |
Bookmark and Share
Add to My Yahoo! email this story to a friend E-Mail print story Print
Text Size:

tool name

close
tool goes here

As the 2009 legislative session entered its final days, the president pro tem of the state Senate, Darrell Steinberg, lamented the Capitol's "culture of failure."

He was referring specifically to the Assembly's rejection of an ambitious prison overhaul plan, reducing inmates to save money and respond to federal court pressure, but made it clear that it applied to other long-stalled issues as well, especially water policy.

"I don't want to be part of a culture of failure," Steinberg said, talking hopefully about "a window of opportunity to get a big (water) package done before the end of the session."

Call The Bee's Dan Walters, (916) 321-1195. Back columns, www.sacbee.com/walters.

Well, he tried, but as the session ended early Saturday, water remained on the Capitol's shelf of unfinished business, and Steinberg settled for the Assembly's version of prison reform that he had criticized earlier as being too weak.

Steinberg put on a positive spin, saying that even without water, "I think it was an incredible session." He cited a two-bill package that requires a higher commitment to renewable energy such as wind and solar – but Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger will veto it.

With the stalemate on water, 2009 goes down as a year in which the Legislature added to its reputation for endemic impotence. Steinberg learned, if he didn't know it already, that when it comes to visceral, multi-stakeholder issues such as prisons or water rights, big moves are nearly impossible. One could add another perennially thorny issue, the state budget.

The Legislature passed a new version of the 2008-09 budget and two versions of the 2009-10 budget, all of which were loaded with gimmicks and short-term spending cuts and revenues, and everyone in the Capitol knows that the budget still leaks red ink.

The prison overhaul was supposed to help the budget by saving $1.2 billion, so that hole remains partially unfilled. Other assumptions and tax revenues are also falling short, so it's likely that by January, if not before, Schwarzenegger and legislators will reopen the budget for more revisions.

Even if the budget holds longer, the Legislature likely will return later this fall for one or more special sessions, including one devoted to a pending recommendation of a commission on overhauling the state's taxation system – if the commission can reach agreement itself.

While many high-profile issues were left hanging, the Legislature devoted most of its final hours to disposing of dozens of lesser measures, not a few of which were favors to various special interests, including a late-blooming measure promoted by megadeveloper Ed Roski Jr. and labor unions to exempt a proposed professional football stadium in the City of Industry from environmental clearance.

A flying wedge of lobbyists pushed the bill through the Assembly, a classic 11th-hour slam job. But Steinberg put it on hold in the Senate, a small victory for integrity in an otherwise dismal year.

About comments

Reader comments on SanLuisObispo.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Tribune. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What you should know about comments on SanLuisObispo.com

SanLuisObispo.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. See our full terms of service here.

Here are some rules of the road:

  • Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.
  • Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.
  • Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.
  • Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and leave him a public message.
  • Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.
  • Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.
  • Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.
  • Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Tribune does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at webmaster@sanluisobispo.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the username of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to webmaster@sanluisobispo.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

Top Jobs
Quick Job Search