'); } -->
Comments (0) | Bowing to local pressure, the federal Nuclear Regulatory Commission has agreed to reschedule a hearing to take public comment on generic rules governing the renewal of nuclear power plant licenses.
The meeting had been set for Tuesday evening in Westlake Village, a Los Angeles County town near Thousand Oaks.
However, local elected officials and activists argued that San Luis Obispo County residents were unlikely to attend a meeting held about 160 miles away.
The agency has agreed to postpone the hearing to an undetermined later date and location, said Roger Hannah, NRC spokesman.
Two separate hearings are also possible, or the agency will try to find a location more convenient to the public.
The Westlake Village location had been selected because it is equidistant between the state’s two nuclear power plants — Diablo Canyon and San Onofre — and near Highway 101, Hannah said.
However, San Luis Obispo County Supervisor Adam Hill — whose district includes Diablo Canyon — and Rep. Lois Capps, D-Santa Barbara, and multiple local activists protested.
They want the meeting to be held locally.
Preferably, separate hearings at each power plant should be held, they said.
David Weisman of Morro Bay, with the Alliance for Nuclear Responsibility, said, “The halfway point in Westlake Village may be mathematically accurate, but it is exponentially inconvenient.”
The purpose of the meeting is to take public comment on a generic environmental impact statement the agency has prepared for an update of rules governing what issues must be examined when a utility applies to renew an operating license for its nuclear power plant.
Pacific Gas and Electric Co. is expected to apply to renew Diablo Canyon’s two operating licenses — which expire in 2024 and 2025 — but no final decision has been made.
If an application is made, PG&E will be given a separate list of environmental issues specific to Diablo Canyon that must be examined, Hannah said.
Reach David Sneed at 781-7930.
SanLuisObispo.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. See our full terms of service here.
Here are some rules of the road:
You should also know that The Tribune does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at webmaster@sanluisobispo.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.
If you submit a comment, the username of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to webmaster@sanluisobispo.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.
About comments
Reader comments on SanLuisObispo.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Tribune. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.