'); } -->
Two influential water districts and several environmental groups said Monday they support key elements of water legislation under negotiation in the Capitol. But the compromise is not good enough for Republican leaders, who said they still have "grave concerns" that the proposals would "create new layers of bureaucracy."
The pact between Westlands Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California and key environmental groups comes after weeks of closed-door negotiations over new policies to mandate conservation, track groundwater levels and create agencies to oversee the troubled Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta.
Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg, D-Sacramento, cited the agreement as major progress and called for a vote this week on a larger water deal, which would include a bond to pay for projects.
"We have narrowed the differences in ways that now we think are creating a momentum that did not exist six weeks ago," he said.
But GOP leaders said they still have issues with the conservation and groundwater rules. "After weeks and weeks and weeks of discussion, to find that our concerns evidently were not taken seriously is disappointing," said Assembly Republican leader Sam Blakeslee. Republicans have "grave concerns whether or not this actually solves the water problem," he said.
One GOP fear is that new conservation requirements would lead to lawsuits against urban water agencies that don't meet the targets.
Environmentalists counter that Republicans seek to undermine existing laws that protect against the "waste and unreasonable use" of water.
Another flashpoint is the size and scope of a bond to pay for dams and other projects. Lawmakers must give out enough money to please varied water interests but are contending with criticism that the financially strapped state cannot afford new borrowing.
Details have not been released, but the latest bond proposal is in the range of $9 billion.
The Westlands and Metropolitan districts both of which import large amounts of Delta water gave their support for the policy changes at a legislative hearing on the bill. Westlands lobbyist Ed Manning said the district's biggest demand was met: that a proposed council to oversee the Delta would not slow planning for a canal to move water around the estuary, also known as "conveyance." Westlands' deliveries have been curtailed because the water is now pumped through the Delta and courts have found that the system hurts fish.
Under the compromise, a new Delta council would incorporate the canal into its long-range plans only if it meets environmental standards and is approved by an ongoing effort called the Bay Delta Conservation Plan.
SanLuisObispo.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. See our full terms of service here.
Here are some rules of the road:
You should also know that The Tribune does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at webmaster@sanluisobispo.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.
If you submit a comment, the username of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to webmaster@sanluisobispo.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.
About comments
Reader comments on SanLuisObispo.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Tribune. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.