Other than the meaningless bureaucratese of management style, there has been no explanation as to why the great majority of the DAs staff wont support Tim Covello.
We need some specifics on exactly what Mr. Covello has done to so alienate the staff that they dont want to work for him, which should be the end of the matter. How could we possibly elect someone nobody wants to work for? And how could The Tribune ignore such a monumental factor in endorsing him, after failing to do the digging necessary to give us the answer?
Except, except, theres that pesky question about why Dan Dow took contributions from the defense attorney on the sex case. As per management style, saying it wasnt technically illegal doesnt come close to cutting it. Mr. Dow needs to answer the same question Jay Leno asked Hugh Grant: What were you thinking?