Letter to the Editor

Diablo alternatives

Paso RoblesNovember 5, 2013 

The proposal for Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant to install cooling towers costing up to $12 billion to get rid of “once-through” cooling is to be paid by ratepayers.

The whole facility cost $5 billion to $6 billion. It currently costs about a third of a billion dollars a year to run, with permits ending in 2025. The 40-year lifecycle cost is therefore about $18 billion, not counting decommissioning costs, a Fukushima-type event or nuclear waste storage for thousands of years, so the true cost is likely much more. All this, to provide electricity to 1 million homes.

For consideration: Put that same $12 billion into solar/photovoltaic for 1 million homes, with gas-fired power plants to cover diurnal variation. It would provide $12,000 per home, equal to about 13 panels (installed), a 2.53 kW AC system per home.

Diablo Canyon Power Plant will need to be shut down eventually. Before any decision on cooling towers is made, it is reasonable to look at alternatives and put other proposals on the table for discussion.

The ratepayers need to have a voice in this. After all, it’s their money.

The Tribune is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service