Letter to the Editor

Always a baby

TempletonJuly 25, 2013 

I find it fascinating that long before the “royal baby” was born, it was referred to as such by the mass, and very frenzied, media. It was not referred to as the “royal fetus” before it was born.

Why?

I wonder what that same media’s reaction would have been if the royal couple had decided to end the pregnancy and aborted the “royal baby”... err ... “royal fetus.”

Imagine the outcry!

The Tribune is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service