Letter to the Editor

Place for homeless

Paso RoblesMarch 15, 2013 

The street map notation was “Infirmary.” To the townies of Wakefield, Mass., it was the “Poor Farm,” a 20-acre tract on the edge of our town set aside to accommodate the homeless.

On the property was a large barracks-style building, pastures, barns and sheds. Cattle and poultry raised there provided year-round supplies of meat, dairy products and eggs. The large garden provided vegetables for day-to-day food and for canning. It was no free ride. Except for small administrative costs, it was a selfsufficient operation; all who lived there were required to make it so.

That was 70 years ago. Fast-forward to our time. The homeless situation is in “crisis,” mainly with regard to the location of a new shelter. I submit that the ideal place for a SLO “Poor Farm” is where it always was: the DeVaul property.

Something like a 99-year lease from Mr. DeVaul and his successors is one mechanism that could work. A mini-RV park with electric power and a dump station would keep the homeless who live in their vehicles off the streets. Its design, construction, and operation could engage Cal Poly students and faculty.

The Tribune is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service