Nipomo Mesa landowners vote against water pipeline funding plan

District could now raise rates, place a moratorium on new hookups or pursue rationing

clambert@thetribunenews.comMay 10, 2012 

The Nipomo Community Services District boardroom was quiet Thursday afternoon while some local residents watched as the final ballots were counted to determine the fate of a nearly $26 million project to bring water to the area from Santa Maria.

The silence continued even after district General Manager Michael LeBrun announced the results: The measure had failed, gaining just 48 percent approval from property owners in voting weighted according to proposed land assessments.

Nipomo Community Services District officials were leading the effort to form an assessment district by asking property owners of 8,077 parcels whether they would agree to levy a tax to cover the capital cost of constructing a pipeline to transport water to the Nipomo Mesa.

“I think the community missed a real opportunity,” LeBrun said. “I guess time will tell.”

Now, district officials have to determine their next steps. They could debate whether to try to increase water rates for customers to pay for the construction, or try to reduce consumption through water rationing or by imposing a moratorium on new water hookups.

The board directed LeBrun to return May 23 with options for members to start the discussion.

“Would going back with a rate increase incense the community?” LeBrun said. “We don’t know. That will be up to the board. Their job is to listen to the voices of the community.”

District officials say the pipeline — and the water it would bring — is necessary to reduce overpumping of its only source of water, an underground aquifer, and to prevent saltwater intrusion — the pollution of a freshwater aquifer by seawater creeping underground and moving inland.

However, they faced a groundswell of opposition from residents, including those who formed a group called Mesa Community Alliance, which questioned the project’s cost and the reliability of the Santa Maria water, while asserting that increased water usage has not affected the overall well levels.

“Residents of the Mesa have spoken,” said Pat Eby, an MCA member. In a statement, the group said it does not believe this vote was the last word on the issue.

“MCA believes we have a challenge to ensure we have an adequate water supply in the long term,” the statement read. “We hope to work with the county and other responsible agencies on a long-range plan to provide an alternative water source and to protect our groundwater supply.”

The proposed assessment district would have included those who receive water from the Nipomo district, Golden State Water Co., Rural Water Co. and Woodlands Mutual Water Co.

The district received 4,834 ballots from property owners, with each ballot weighted according to the dollar amount of the proposed assessment to each owner’s property. The value of the ballots cast against the project totaled nearly $7.5 million, while those in favor came to about $6.9 million.

Of the 4,834 ballots, 1,498 were in favor and 3,336 were against forming the assessment district.

To date, the district has spent about $4 million on the pipeline project for costs including environmental work, design and outreach.

Of that, about $3 million came from a portion of fees paid when a home is connected to the district’s water delivery system. The fees were raised in 2005 specifically for the purpose of bringing additional water to the community, LeBrun said.

Reach Cynthia Lambert at 781-7929. Stay updated by following @SouthCountyBeat on Twitter.

The Tribune is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service