You are here: News - Local

Published: 11:53 pm Tuesday, Dec. 13, 2011

Atascadero could split up Walmart-Annex plan

Council wants to study option that drops other shopping center on Del Rio Road

tool name

close
tool goes here
| tstrickland@thetribunenews.com

After more than an hour of heated public comment from critics and supporters Tuesday evening, the Atascadero City Council unanimously approved further study for a Walmart-only option that drops a proposed neighboring shopping center.

A previous plan had both projects being built on the north end of town.

The meeting was aimed at finding solutions for going forward after the developers of both Walmart and The Annex reached an impasse in June on how to fund $3 million to $4.5 million of improvements to the Del Rio Road interchange with Highway 101. The parties have been meeting in closed-door talks since that time, but city staff announced last week that they don’t believe an agreement is forthcoming.

Wal-Mart Stores Inc. is proposing a commercial and residential project while the Santa Barbara-based Rottman Group wants to build The Annex shopping center next to it off Del Rio Road. Neither project has been approved. They are in a stage where consultants are studying how their developments could impact the area.

The actual item before the council was small — approving a $75,100 contract with a 10 percent fee to the city for processing to be funded by Wal-Mart Stores for further impact studies. But the meeting was consumed with concern that taxpayer dollars would be used to quell the dispute.

“We will actively oppose any efforts that end up with taxpayers footing the bill for this project,” Atascadero resident Tom Comar said.

He also presented a box of papers he said had 950 public signatures against the use of public funds and asked the council to sign pledges saying no future plans for such arise.

It’s unclear what the council chose to do with the pledges. In fact, council members didn’t make any comments on the topic before voting, aside from council member Jerry Clay noting they were just voting on the added contract.

The lack of discussion caused some audience concern at Tuesday night’s council meeting. “Basically what this says to me … is their minds were made up,” Atascadero resident David Broadwater said after the meeting.

City staff said Monday that there are no such plans for the use of public money and that Wal-Mart Stores isn’t seeking taxpayer dollars to fund the impact study.

The results from the new contract will be presented to the public in six months as an amendment to an environmental review released in February analyzing how both developments could impact the area, including traffic.

Dropping The Annex in an alternative study doesn’t mean that the city nixed the shopping center’s plans, but was instead defined by city staff as a way to give the council and public more options in what alternative impacts could be.

An Annex-only option, which is also in the February study, wasn’t considered Tuesday because it’s believed that a Walmart store would be the main draw, city officials previously said.

After consulting with a company spokeswoman by phone after the meeting, Wal-Mart Stores attorney Ellen Berkowitz said the retailer is pleased with the council’s action.

She said the retailer will pay an estimated $1.7 million toward the improvements, but that “is not set in stone,” she said. That sum is a cost estimate based on what the consultants say is required by the retailer and the additional study could change it, although Berkowitz said she “doesn’t expect it to be less, but it could be more.”

Keith Mathias, a developer in the Rottman Group, didn’t speak at the meeting. But he said Monday that his company remains committed to building The Annex.

His group would pay about $1.5 million in traffic impact fees if both were built.

About comments

Reader comments on SanLuisObispo.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Tribune. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What you should know about comments on SanLuisObispo.com

SanLuisObispo.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. See our full terms of service here.

Here are some rules of the road:

  • Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.
  • Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.
  • Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.
  • Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and leave him a public message.
  • Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.
  • Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.
  • Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.
  • Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Tribune does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at webmaster@thetribunenews.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the username of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to webmaster@thetribunenews.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

Our news, your way

Get breaking news on your cell phone

Sign up for breaking news alerts from SanLuisObispo.com and get the latest news sent to your cell phone via text message.

Type in your cell phone number

( ) -

I accept the terms and conditions (click to view)

Keep your phone handy!

Upon hitting the Sign up! button, you will receive a message with a four-digit code at the end. Enter this number on the next screen and press the Confirm button.

Terms and Conditions:

By signing up for alerts from this site, you are signing up for a program that may include up to 5 SMS text alert(s) per alert category per day. There is no service fee charged per month but your carrier's standard text messaging and other charges may apply. You may stop this subscription service at any time by sending the text message "STOP" to 72737. You must be at least thirteen (13) years of age to use our alert services. If you are between 13 and 17 years old, you agree that you have received parental permission both to complete the registration process and to receive SMS content on your cell phone. For help, send the text message "HELP" to 72737. This service will work with ATT, Verizon, Sprint, Nextel, Alltell, US Cellular, Cincinnati Bell, Boost, Virgin Mobile USA, Celluar South, Telos, Centennial, East Kentucky Network, Cellcom, Immix and Rural Celluar.

Quick Job Search
Top Jobs