You are here: News - Local

Published: Thursday, Sep. 08, 2011

Former suspect in alleged rape worried about his image

Cal Poly grad anxious about ramifications of his arrest in frat house case that never led to charges

tool name

close
tool goes here

Joseph Trupiano

| nwilson@thetribunenews.com

A San Luis Obispo Police Department investigator should have been more careful with his investigation and arrest of a Cal Poly student over a rape allegation, which has damaged the young man’s reputation, his lawyer told The Tribune in an exclusive interview.

Attorney Gerald Carrasco said the building of a sexual assault case against his client, Joseph Trupiano, should have been handled differently and the arrest avoided.

But Chad Pfarr, the detective who booked Trupiano, told The Tribune he’s convinced the evidence showed a rape had occurred and that he had probable cause to arrest.

After an intensive three-month investigation, prosecutors decided Aug. 26 not to file charges against Trupiano, who was accused of the crime after a May 7 fraternity party.

Trupiano claimed the sex he had with a college-age woman was consensual, according to court documents.

Despite the fact that no charges were filed, Trupiano remains concerned that news of his arrest and publicity about the incident will affect his personal life and employment, Carrasco said.

“The reality is that this was an allegation, but not much more,” Carrasco said. “If a more thorough investigation had been conducted, his name, image and reputation would have been left undamaged.”

Pfarr said his job is to make arrests based on probable cause and not the higher standard in court of proof beyond a reasonable doubt.

“I still believe the victim,” Pfarr said. “(Trupiano’s) reputation is what he made it and the position he put himself in that night.”

Defense argument

Carrasco said his investigator’s interviews with witnesses showed the woman engaged in sexual conduct with another man at the party in public view before she had relations with Trupiano. And the accuser made a sexual solicitation of yet another man at the party as well, the attorney said.

“She initiated those advances,” Carrasco said. “She was very aggressive in her behaviors towards young men.”

In addition, after waking up at the fraternity house on May 8, the woman told witnesses that she was concerned with how her boyfriend would react if he found out about her cheating, giving her a motive to make up the allegation, Carrasco said.

According to a search warrant filed by police, the woman told investigators that she’d blacked out from heavy alcohol consumption, waking up in a fraternity house bedroom with pain that was consistent with rape.

Police used evidence that included the results of a medical examination of the woman, her statements, recorded phone calls between Trupiano and the woman, and other evidence Pfarr declined to disclose.

In a phone call set up by police between Trupiano and the woman, without his knowledge of it being recorded, he said he recalled her leading him into the room and initiating the talk about sex.

Trupiano admitted to her that she passed out in the room, the warrant states. But the timeline of her unconsciousness, whether before or after sex, wasn’t specified.

Carrasco said witnesses observed the woman walking around and talking with people at the party between 1:30 and 3 a.m., which is when she told police she’d blacked out.

Carrasco said he was able to get signed statements from several witnesses detailing observations of some of her behavior, which he turned over to the District Attorney’s Office.

“I understand and appreciate that when a woman makes a point to law enforcement, it should be taken seriously,” Carrasco said. “But an arrest isn’t appropriate if the facts haven’t been developed.”

Police argument

Pfarr maintains that the evidence pointed him in the direction of making an arrest.

Pfarr said the woman didn’t remember having “any sexual activity” at the party and said she didn’t have a boyfriend. Also, some witnesses Pfarr interviewed who were at the party had trouble distinguishing the accuser from another woman who was there.

“I absolutely believe what she was telling me,” Pfarr said.

Pfarr also said that many of the witnesses refused to give statements and Trupiano also declined to give police a statement after consulting with Carrasco.

The detective said he believes the case wasn’t charged partly because the woman couldn’t remember the incident.

Prosecutors investigated for more than three months, deciding they couldn’t prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt.

That investigation included interviews with numerous individuals, examinations of photographs, analysis of physical evidence and scientific testing, as well as a consideration of phone messages.

The District Attorney’s Office declined to comment on the case but issued a statement saying “the decision to reject the case for filing a criminal complaint does not mean that the alleged victim is to be disbelieved or that her description of the events that she can recollect is not credible.”

The aftermath

The sense of relief Trupiano felt when criminal charges weren’t filed hasn’t entirely calmed his anxiety about how the case may affect his future, Carrasco said. Trupiano declined to speak to The Tribune for this story.

Trupiano recently graduated from Cal Poly with a degree in agribusiness; he received numerous letters of recommendation about his character from Cal Poly and high school teachers after his lawyer sought assessments from those who knew him.

But Carrasco said Trupiano has expressed concern about what possible employers and new acquaintances may think if they find out about the arrest.

“I’ve reminded him that he needs to understand that as the law has dictated, through the district attorney’s actions in this case, he has done nothing wrong,” Carrasco said.

Carrasco also said that he is working on a petition for his client to obtain a factual finding of innocence that could purge arrest records from the court and law enforcement databases.

For Pfarr, the case has been “frustrating for me and for the victim.” Even though she was not named in media stories about the case as a victim alleging a sex crime, the public nature has affected her, he said.

“The humiliation of having it out in the public and then not having it go forward, it makes her look bad,” he said. “She has been on trial. She’s suffering and will for a long time.”

During the course of interviews for this story, Carrasco and Pfarr both acknowledged the difficulty of nailing down evidence because of the amount of alcohol consumed at the party and how that affected recollections of those involved.

About comments

Reader comments on SanLuisObispo.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Tribune. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What you should know about comments on SanLuisObispo.com

SanLuisObispo.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. See our full terms of service here.

Here are some rules of the road:

  • Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.
  • Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.
  • Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.
  • Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and leave him a public message.
  • Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.
  • Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.
  • Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.
  • Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Tribune does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at webmaster@thetribunenews.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the username of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to webmaster@thetribunenews.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

Our news, your way

Get breaking news on your cell phone

Sign up for breaking news alerts from SanLuisObispo.com and get the latest news sent to your cell phone via text message.

Type in your cell phone number

( ) -

I accept the terms and conditions (click to view)

Keep your phone handy!

Upon hitting the Sign up! button, you will receive a message with a four-digit code at the end. Enter this number on the next screen and press the Confirm button.

Terms and Conditions:

By signing up for alerts from this site, you are signing up for a program that may include up to 5 SMS text alert(s) per alert category per day. There is no service fee charged per month but your carrier's standard text messaging and other charges may apply. You may stop this subscription service at any time by sending the text message "STOP" to 72737. You must be at least thirteen (13) years of age to use our alert services. If you are between 13 and 17 years old, you agree that you have received parental permission both to complete the registration process and to receive SMS content on your cell phone. For help, send the text message "HELP" to 72737. This service will work with ATT, Verizon, Sprint, Nextel, Alltell, US Cellular, Cincinnati Bell, Boost, Virgin Mobile USA, Celluar South, Telos, Centennial, East Kentucky Network, Cellcom, Immix and Rural Celluar.

Quick Job Search
Top Jobs