San Luis Obispo County Superior Court trying to cut $1 million from budget

‘Everything is on the table,’ says executive officer, including furloughs, layoffs and closing courtrooms

nwilson@thetribunenews.comAugust 14, 2011 

San Luis Obispo County Superior Court is trying to decide how to cut $1 million from an operating budget that has been severely affected by the state budget shortfall.

Court officials said the operating budget is estimated to be about $19 million this year, but revenue projection will leave a gap of about $1 million.

The reduction comes as part of a $350 million slashing of the state judicial branch’s budget for the fiscal year 2011-12. A management team of county judges and court officials is faced with taking drastic measures to balance the budget, which is expected to be done within a month.

“Everything is on the table, including reducing court hours, furloughs, layoffs and closing courtrooms,” said Susan Matherly, the local court’s executive officer.

The San Luis Obispo Superior Court — which has 145 employees — has operated under a soft hiring freeze since June 2009, during which it has filled some critical positions but mostly left jobs vacant through attrition. The court’s normal staffing number is 162 employees. About 80 percent of the budget is payroll.

And the court already dipped into its reserves in the fiscal year 2009-10 to pay for staff to perform administrative work on once-a-month furlough days implemented statewide that year.

Presiding Judge Charles S. Crandall, who makes final administrative decisions, said “the goal is to avoid layoffs” in the county court system this year. But officials are still in the early stages of making decisions, and specifics are yet to be determined.

Court officials considered closing the Grover Beach branch last year. But community reaction was that the court provided a valuable service, so it was kept it open. The Grover Beach court handles misdemeanors, civil cases, small claims and juvenile cases.

Crandall said reducing costs such as building upkeep will have to be weighed against other considerations that may involve staff-related cuts.

The Tribune is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service