'); } -->
Cell-phone coverage in Cambria and on the North Coast has been notoriously porous, drawing numerous complaints over a long period of time from residents, visitors and emergency responders.
A new cell antenna is expected to come online in early August. To answer
the seemingly eternal question— which cellular provider provides
the best coverage here — The Cambrian conducted a spot check of cell-phone reception at 31 sites in the Cambria and San Simeon area.
The results should give readers a record of how coverage was before the new antenna came on line. We plan to do another Verizon check afterwards to find out how coverage from that provider has changed.
For now, AT&T and Cellular One came out clearly superior, with at least one “bar” of signal strength at nearly all the sites. It figures the two came out with very close results, as AT&T reached an agreement in May with Cellular One to use its towers for “roaming.” T-Mobile has a similar agreement.
Assisting The Cambrian with the survey were Rick Auricchio of Cambria and his friend, Creed Erickson of Livermore. Their iPhones in hand, the two computer experts accompanied Staff Writer Kathe Tanner on the three-hour, 68-mile search for good cell reception.
No Sprint/Nextel phone was available for the survey; The Cambrian welcomes data from that and other providers. E-mail information to Cambrian@thetribunenews.com.
Cell tower sites
Current cellular tower sites, according to county and State Park records and other sources, include:
• Hearst Castle, two 95-foot-tall monopines on China Hill (a differ-
ent peak on the same hillside as the State Historical Landmark), with antennas for ATT (formerly Cingular), Verizon, Cellular One and Sprint (Nextel);
• Santa Rosa Catholic Church (inside the steeple), serving Cellular One and AT&T (roaming);
• Medical building, 2150 Main St., serving Cellular One, AT&T (roaming);
• Cambria Pines Lodge has a micro-cell repeater;
•Ragged Point Inn, serving Cellular One;
• Former Cambria Air Force Station, serving Cellular One; and
• Townsend ranch, next to former air force station, serving Verizon, Sprint, TMobile;
In the works
Additional cell towers are in various stages:
• A second site at Santa Rosa Catholic Church (in the recently heightened bell-tower) on Main Street will serve Verizon customers. Installation is underway, with completion expected by September, county planner Airlin Singewald said July 27.
• Old Cambria Air Force Station. An application for an AT&T antenna. The North Coast Advisory Council recommended approval and plans are “under review” at the county, Singewald said. “We should be able to get this project to hearing within a few months after we accept the application as complete,” which will depend on how long it takes AT&T to get additional information to the county.
• Plans have also been floated, but not filed, to add a cell site on the southeast end of Pine Knolls in the Pinewood Drive/Grove Street area overlooking Main Street.
Road testing cell phones
Some results of The Cambrian’s survey were surprising.
Two identical phones can get slightly different readings at the same time in the same place, according to where in the car the handler was sitting, how close the phone was to a window and to which tower the service was trying to connect.
And, as recently noted after introduction of a newer iPhone, how a phone is held can make a difference.
Readings varied because at each site, phones rarely locked on to one set of bars and stayed there.
Auricchio explained that, “because of AT&T's roaming agreement with Cellular One, an AT&T phone generally connects first with an AT&T tower, even if the signal is somewhat weak. After a few minutes, it may then roam to the stronger Cell- One tower.”
SanLuisObispo.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. See our full terms of service here.
Here are some rules of the road:
You should also know that The Tribune does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at webmaster@sanluisobispo.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.
If you submit a comment, the username of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to webmaster@sanluisobispo.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.
About comments
Reader comments on SanLuisObispo.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Tribune. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.