The search will begin anew this fall for a new Cal Poly president.
Capping a four-month quest, Cal State Universitys board of trustees determined Wednesday that two finalists werent the right fit.
'); } -->
The search will begin anew this fall for a new Cal Poly president.
Capping a four-month quest, Cal State Universitys board of trustees determined Wednesday that two finalists werent the right fit.
A third had withdrawn after visiting the campus last week. A fourth finalist had withdrawn from consideration before the on-site visits.
The board of trustees certainly respects the level of experience the candidates bring to the process, CSU Chancellor Charles B. Reed said in a statement. But ultimately, we must be confident that the next president be the right fit with the campus and the community.
It was unclear late Wednesday if President Warren Baker would remain in the job until a successor could be hired; he had planned to retire at the end of this academic year.
If Baker does retire, Reed said, an interim Cal Poly president could be named.
The board interviewed Sona Andrews, provost of Boise State University in Idaho, and Steven Angle, a provost and professor of chemistry at Wright State University in Ohio, on Wednesday.
The third finalist, Carlo Montemagno, University of Cincinnatis engineering dean, had withdrawn from consideration after visiting the campus.
Reed said he recommended a new search.
Reed said he didnt have a chance to speak with Baker after Wednesdays board decision. Cal Poly officials said Wednesday afternoon that Baker was traveling and unavailable for comment about how much longer hed stay on.
Candidates didnt fit
Reed would not disclose exactly why a finalist wasnt chosen but said that finding a match between a university and president is like a marriage.
The chancellor said there was a feeling among the board that (the candidates) just didnt fit the role of president for Cal Poly San Luis Obispo and were looking for somebody who can lead a polytechnic university. Reed said the CSU is competing to attract candidates within national presidential compensation levels that are often much higher than we are able to offer.
The chancellor said presidents of public polytechnic universities elsewhere in the U.S. make between $500,000 and $1 million per year. Reed said CSU presidents have average salaries of less than $300,000 per year.
Baker, now in his 31st year as president, earns about $390,000 a year, according to the Sacramento Bee salary database. That amount includes his salary, as well as housing and car allowances.
Cal Polys new president must also be effective in a broad range of areas from fundraising to programs and budget decisions, Reed said.
Hiring a CSU president is the most important decision that the board and I make, he said. We have to invest in it.
The search
An 18-member group that included Reed and five CSU trustees, as well as representatives of Cal Polys faculty, administration, staff, students and alumni started its search in February with an initial list of 90 candidates, Reed said.
He acknowledged that a fourth prospective finalist withdrew from consideration before the three finalists visited Cal Poly. That persons name wasnt revealed based on a confidentiality protocol of the search committee.
The new search will consider candidates with education and other backgrounds, like the previous search, and will be conducted in the same way, Reed said.
The CSU hired the search firm Storbeck/Pimentel and Associates for an amount not to exceed $87,500 to conduct the search, CSU officials previously stated. A new headhunter firm likely will be hired, Reed said.
Unny Menon, an engineering professor and academic senator, said that to maintain the universitys high rank nationally, its better to get the right person than to settle for an available candidate.
Our primary interest is to get somebody who can sustain what President Baker has brought us up to, Menon said. Weve been fortunate to have high quality leadership from Baker for three decades. To get a successor as good is tough.
SanLuisObispo.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. See our full terms of service here.
Here are some rules of the road:
You should also know that The Tribune does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at webmaster@thetribunenews.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.
If you submit a comment, the username of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to webmaster@thetribunenews.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.
About comments
Reader comments on SanLuisObispo.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Tribune. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.