You are here: Newsletters - Breaking News :: San Luis Obispo

Published: Thursday, Jun. 03, 2010

CSU trustees decide to restart search for new Cal Poly president

tool name

close
tool goes here
| nwilson@thetribunenews.com

The search will begin anew this fall for a new Cal Poly president.

Capping a four-month quest, Cal State University’s board of trustees determined Wednesday that two finalists weren’t the right fit.

A third had withdrawn after visiting the campus last week. A fourth finalist had withdrawn from consideration before the on-site visits.

“The board of trustees certainly respects the level of experience the candidates bring to the process,” CSU Chancellor Charles B. Reed said in a statement. “But ultimately, we must be confident that the next president be the right fit with the campus and the community.”

It was unclear late Wednesday if President Warren Baker would remain in the job until a successor could be hired; he had planned to retire at the end of this academic year.

If Baker does retire, Reed said, an interim Cal Poly president could be named.

The board interviewed Sona Andrews, provost of Boise State University in Idaho, and Steven Angle, a provost and professor of chemistry at Wright State University in Ohio, on Wednesday.

The third finalist, Carlo Montemagno, University of Cincinnati’s engineering dean, had withdrawn from consideration after visiting the campus.

Reed said he recommended a new search.

Reed said he didn’t have a chance to speak with Baker after Wednesday’s board decision. Cal Poly officials said Wednesday afternoon that Baker was traveling and unavailable for comment about how much longer he’d stay on.

Candidates ‘didn’t fit’

Reed would not disclose exactly why a finalist wasn’t chosen but said that finding a match between a university and president is “like a marriage.”

The chancellor said “there was a feeling among the board that (the candidates) just didn’t fit the role of president for Cal Poly San Luis Obispo” and “we’re looking for somebody who can lead a polytechnic university.” Reed said the CSU is competing to attract candidates within national presidential compensation levels that are often “much higher than we are able to offer.”

The chancellor said presidents of public polytechnic universities elsewhere in the U.S. make between $500,000 and $1 million per year. Reed said CSU presidents have average salaries of less than $300,000 per year.

Baker, now in his 31st year as president, earns about $390,000 a year, according to the Sacramento Bee salary database. That amount includes his salary, as well as housing and car allowances.

Cal Poly’s new president must also be effective in a broad range of areas from fundraising to programs and budget decisions, Reed said.

“Hiring a CSU president is the most important decision that the board and I make,” he said. “We have to invest in it.”

The search

An 18-member group that included Reed and five CSU trustees, as well as representatives of Cal Poly’s faculty, administration, staff, students and alumni started its search in February with an initial list of 90 candidates, Reed said.

He acknowledged that a fourth prospective finalist withdrew from consideration before the three finalists visited Cal Poly. That person’s name wasn’t revealed based on a confidentiality protocol of the search committee.

The new search will consider candidates with education and other backgrounds, like the previous search, and will be conducted in the same way, Reed said.

The CSU hired the search firm Storbeck/Pimentel and Associates for an amount not to exceed $87,500 to conduct the search, CSU officials previously stated. A new headhunter firm likely will be hired, Reed said.

Unny Menon, an engineering professor and academic senator, said that to maintain the university’s high rank nationally, it’s better to get the right person than to settle for an available candidate.

“Our primary interest is to get somebody who can sustain what President Baker has brought us up to,” Menon said. “We’ve been fortunate to have high quality leadership from Baker for three decades. To get a successor as good is tough.”

About comments

Reader comments on SanLuisObispo.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Tribune. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What you should know about comments on SanLuisObispo.com

SanLuisObispo.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. See our full terms of service here.

Here are some rules of the road:

  • Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.
  • Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.
  • Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.
  • Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and leave him a public message.
  • Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.
  • Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.
  • Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.
  • Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Tribune does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at webmaster@thetribunenews.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the username of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to webmaster@thetribunenews.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

Our news, your way

Get breaking news on your cell phone

Sign up for breaking news alerts from SanLuisObispo.com and get the latest news sent to your cell phone via text message.

Type in your cell phone number

( ) -

I accept the terms and conditions (click to view)

Keep your phone handy!

Upon hitting the Sign up! button, you will receive a message with a four-digit code at the end. Enter this number on the next screen and press the Confirm button.

Terms and Conditions:

By signing up for alerts from this site, you are signing up for a program that may include up to 5 SMS text alert(s) per alert category per day. There is no service fee charged per month but your carrier's standard text messaging and other charges may apply. You may stop this subscription service at any time by sending the text message "STOP" to 72737. You must be at least thirteen (13) years of age to use our alert services. If you are between 13 and 17 years old, you agree that you have received parental permission both to complete the registration process and to receive SMS content on your cell phone. For help, send the text message "HELP" to 72737. This service will work with ATT, Verizon, Sprint, Nextel, Alltell, US Cellular, Cincinnati Bell, Boost, Virgin Mobile USA, Celluar South, Telos, Centennial, East Kentucky Network, Cellcom, Immix and Rural Celluar.

Quick Job Search
Top Jobs