You are here: News - Local - The Cambrian

Published: Thursday, Apr. 22, 2010

CCSD may say tests are Corps responsibility

Army had orginally filed for exemption, but district filed environmental report

tool name

close
tool goes here

The Cambria Community Services District appears poised to leave environmental clearance for beach well testing needed for desalination planning in the hands of the Army Corps of Engineers, a federal agency that would have to meet federal standards, but not requirements of the California Environment Quality Act (CEQA).

On the agenda for to-day’s district board meeting is adoption of a resolution “acknowledging U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ sole responsibility for the Santa Rosa Creek Beach geotechnical and hydrogeological study.”

  • CCSD meeting today

    The Cambria Community Services District Board of Directors meets in open session at 12:30 p.m. today, April 22, at the Veterans Memorial Building, 1000 Main St. For more on the meeting, see InBrief on Page 5 and PublicMeetings on Page 18.

As a federal agency, the Corps doesn’t have to get project permission from county or state agencies, but must submit notice of a “categorical exclusion for

planning and technical studies.” The Corps sent a notice dated Dec. 21 to the state Coastal Commission stating that the proposed testing on, under and near the beach at the mouth of Santa Rosa Creek is “consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the California Coastal Act” and asking that the commission agree with the “consistency determination.”

Commission consideration was scheduled for April 15, but was postponed to a later date. Commission staffer Tom Luster said April 9 he hopes to schedule the hearing at the agency’s mid-May meeting, but that action will depend on what the services district board decides today and decisions by the Corps.

The Cambria district originally called a special meeting Jan. 5 to consider filing a notice of exemption from CEQA, in line with the Corps notice to the commission, but after public testimony about potential environmental impacts, instead decided to do an initial environmental study under CEQA. On Jan. 14, it filed a “negative declaration” with the county, stating, “there is no substantial evidence that the Project may have a significant ef fect on the environment.”

The district’s report has drawn more than 100 pages of comments from individuals, groups and permit-issuing agencies.

Adoption of that report by the CCSD board was postponed at its meetings on Feb. 25 and March 25.

Testing at the current site has been part of CCSD plans since mid-2008, after the Coastal Commission turned back plans to do testing at the mouth of San Simeon Creek. The tests call for drilling up to 10 test holes so the soil can be studied and converting up to three holes into test wells so the potential water flow can be tested—all to determine if the area could supply enough water to supply a desalination plant.

The actual desalination plant would be located away from the beach and would be subject of a full environmental impact report before construction.

The Corps is involved in Cambria’s desalination project because federal money, including so-called “stimulus funds,” have been pledged to design and build the plant. Under the project cooperation agreement between the two agencies, the desalination project is a joint ef fort of the two agencies.

According to Greg Sanders, president of the district board, he and Director Muril Clift, General Manager Tammy Rudock and District Engineer Bob Gresens met Friday, April 16, with high-level Corps staf fers, including Col. Thomas Magness, commander of the Los Angeles District office, and other senior members of the team that’s working on Cambria’s desalination project.

Sanders said Sunday, April 18, he couldn’t divulge specifics about the meeting, because other district board members hadn’t been briefed. Also, the district is waiting for a confirmation letter from the Corps that would detail exactly how the agency will proceed.

Cambrian Editor Bert Etling contributed to this report.

About comments

Reader comments on SanLuisObispo.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Tribune. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What you should know about comments on SanLuisObispo.com

SanLuisObispo.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. See our full terms of service here.

Here are some rules of the road:

  • Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.
  • Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.
  • Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.
  • Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and leave him a public message.
  • Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.
  • Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.
  • Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.
  • Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Tribune does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at webmaster@thetribunenews.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the username of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to webmaster@thetribunenews.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

Our news, your way

Get breaking news on your cell phone

Sign up for breaking news alerts from SanLuisObispo.com and get the latest news sent to your cell phone via text message.

Type in your cell phone number

( ) -

I accept the terms and conditions (click to view)

Keep your phone handy!

Upon hitting the Sign up! button, you will receive a message with a four-digit code at the end. Enter this number on the next screen and press the Confirm button.

Terms and Conditions:

By signing up for alerts from this site, you are signing up for a program that may include up to 5 SMS text alert(s) per alert category per day. There is no service fee charged per month but your carrier's standard text messaging and other charges may apply. You may stop this subscription service at any time by sending the text message "STOP" to 72737. You must be at least thirteen (13) years of age to use our alert services. If you are between 13 and 17 years old, you agree that you have received parental permission both to complete the registration process and to receive SMS content on your cell phone. For help, send the text message "HELP" to 72737. This service will work with ATT, Verizon, Sprint, Nextel, Alltell, US Cellular, Cincinnati Bell, Boost, Virgin Mobile USA, Celluar South, Telos, Centennial, East Kentucky Network, Cellcom, Immix and Rural Celluar.

Quick Job Search
Top Jobs