Bracket Challenge
Wine

Published: Sunday, Jan. 24, 2010

Updated: 1:25 pm Monday, Jan. 25, 2010

Notes from Chronicle wine contest

Comments (0) |
Bookmark and Share
Add to My Yahoo! email this story to a friend E-Mail print story Print
Text Size:

tool name

close
tool goes here

The Grapev ine

There was good news and bad news at the world’s largest competition involving American wines, held recently in Sonoma County. More than 4,900 wines, from places as diverse as California, New York, Michigan and even South Dakota, were entered in the San Francisco Chronicle Wine Competition, and there was a lot to like among some of the categories that I evaluated.

GOOD NEWS: Outstanding wines are being produced all over the country.

  • PICK OF THE WEEK

    Midnight Cellars 2006 Full Moon Red ($14) This easy-to- drink red blend (mostly syrah and zinfandel) offers soft berry and spice flavors with a little kick of tannin on the finish.

In the sweepstakes round, where judges pick the best of the best, 80 percent of the 81 wines were from California. But there were also big winners from New York’s Finger Lakes region (five wines), Washington state (five), Oregon (four) and New Mexico and South Dakota (one each).

The top wines in the sparkling ( non-vintage J Brut Rosé, $35), pink ( 2008 Bray Barbera Rosato, $17) and red ( 2007 Graton Ridge Paul Family Vineyard Pinot Noir, $40) divisions were from California, but the best white was a 2008 Keuka Spring Gewurztraminer ($17) from the Finger Lakes, and the best dessert wine was the 2008 Watermill Late Harvest Gewurztraminer ($14/375ml) from Washington.

I judged a riesling category that was chock full of good wines from New York and Michigan; the best-of-class winner was the 2008 Willamette Valley Vineyards Riesling ($12) from Oregon. Unfortunately, it’s nearly impossible to buy many of the out-of-state wines unless you order them.

BAD NEWS: Merlot producers need to pick up their game. I evaluated 53 merlots priced from $20 to $24.99, and many of the wines were shockingly bad. My tasting notes included observations like “stinky and tart,” “brutally tannic,” “terrible oak” and —my favorite — “smells like fish.” Astringency and aggressive tannins were frequent problems.

Please understand that I’m not saying that people shouldn’t drink merlot. But I think you have the right to expect better quality, especially when you’re paying 20 bucks a bottle. A couple to try are the best-of- class winner, 2007 Frei Brothers Reserve Merlot ($20), and the 2007 Hook and Ladder Merlot ($24), which I also liked.

GOOD NEWS: Domestic pinot noir continues to improve. I judged 58 pinots priced from $35 to $39.99 —not cheap but far from the most expensive category. Fourteen of them were awarded gold medals. The best of class was the 2007 Hook and Ladder Third Alarm Reserve Pinot Noir ($35), an intense, ripe Russian River pinot with black raspberry fruit and firm structure. Other highlights included a local wine, the 2008 Kelsey See Canyon Pinot Noir ($35), with its blackberry pie flavors and firm structure; the elegant, slightly earthy 2006 Clary Ranch Pinot Noir ($39.50); and the complex, smooth 2008 De La Montanya Tina’s Vineyard Pinot Noir ($39).

Next week, I’ll tell you about some more good news: the strong performance by some Paso Robles petite sirahs.

About comments

Reader comments on SanLuisObispo.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Tribune. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What you should know about comments on SanLuisObispo.com

SanLuisObispo.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. See our full terms of service here.

Here are some rules of the road:

  • Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.
  • Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.
  • Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.
  • Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and leave him a public message.
  • Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.
  • Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.
  • Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.
  • Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Tribune does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at webmaster@sanluisobispo.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the username of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to webmaster@sanluisobispo.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

Top Jobs
Quick Job Search