You are here: Entertainment

Published: Thursday, Jan. 21, 2010

Updated: 9:08 am Sunday, Apr. 18, 2010

The all-time Grammys

As history has shown, not all Grammys were created equal; this ranking seeks to set the record straight on the all-time best music

tool name

close
tool goes here
By ASSOCIATED PRESS FILE PHOTOS

Billy Joel

Let’s get something straight: The Grammy awards don’t necessarily represent the best in music.

After all, only one Beatles album ever won a Grammy. And Celine Dion has more Grammys than the Rolling Stones.

  • THE ALL-TIME GRAMMYS
  • THE UNWORTHYS

    When you think of the musical greats, lots of names come up: The Beatles, Ella Fitzgerald, U2, the Supremes.

    Not Taste of Honey.

    But through the years plenty of unworthy acts have been awarded

    Grammys. (To name a few: Michael Bolton, Terence Trent D’Arby, Kelly Clarkson and Justin Timberlake.) Here are some of the most undeserving ones:

    5th Dimension (Song and Record of the Year, “Up, Up and Away,” 1967): Better known for their corny hippy song “Age of the Aquarius,” these guys won two of the biggest awards with this dippy ditty. Did people really think they were better than the Beatles, Rolling Stones and every Motown act that year?

    Ray Stevens (Best Contemporary Vocal Performance by a Male for “Everything is Beautiful,” 1970): The goofball who gave us “Ahab the Arab” actually won a Grammy? For real?

    Debby Boone (Best New Artist, 1977): Her “You Light Up My Life” was #1 for an astounding 10 weeks, then she turned to country and then Christian music and we never heard from her again.

    Taste of Honey (Best New Artist, 1978): Their big hit, “Boogie Ooge Oogie” is good enough to be included on a disco compilation CD but not much else.

    Starland Vocal Band (Best New Artist, 1976): With the success of their song “Afternoon Delight,” these guys got a No. 1 hit and even a TV show featuring a then-unknown David Letterman. But soon Letterman would become very known and SVB would sink into obscurity.

    —Patrick S. Pemberton

I mean — come on. Celine Dion?

But while sales figures gauge popularity, the Grammys are still the ultimate measure of critical success — as will be the case when the latest round of Grammys are awarded in Los Angeles on Jan. 31.

I’ll admit, the Grammys have recognized some great music. Still, it seems like the standards have gone down. Do you think the Dixie Chicks would have done so well in 2007 had the competition not included lightweights like James Blunt, Justin Timberlake and Carrie Underwood?

Longing for a return to the great Grammy nominees, I recently looked at past winners and decided to hold my very own awards — the All-Time Grammys. Here I’ve nominated previous (worthy) winners from the major categories and pitted them against each other:

Best All-Time Record

• “Mrs. Robinson,” Simon and Garfunkel (1968)

• “Hotel California,” Eagles (1977)

• “Just the Way You Are,” Billy Joel (1978)

• “Beat It,” Michael Jackson (1983)

• “What’s Love Got To Do With It,” Tina Turner (1984)

The line “Where have you gone, Joe DiMaggio” from “Mrs. Robinson” says so much: It’s about the end of an era, a desire to return to a certain innocence. On the other hand, the guitar solos from “Hotel California” represent some of the best instrumental pieces in rock music. And, of course, “Beat It” is Michael Jackson’s signature tune, guided by Eddie Van Halen’s searing guitar solo. But I’m a sucker for a sappy love song. The warm tone and smooth vocals on “Just the Way You Are” always compel me to sing along. With the windows closed, of course.

And the Winner Is: “Just the Way You Are”

Best All-Time Album

• “Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Heart’s Club Band,” The Beatles (1967)

• “Songs in the Key of Life,” Stevie Wonder (1976)

• “Rumours,” Fleetwood Mac (1977)

• “Thriller,” Michael Jackson (1983)

• “Joshua Tree,” U2 (1987)

“Sgt. Pepper” was groundbreaking, but I think there are better Beatles albums (like “Abbey Road,” “Revolver” and” “Rubber Soul”). “Songs in the Key of Life” is a fantastic double-album with loads of variety and socially conscious lyrics. And “Rumours” doesn’t have a clunker on it. But “Thriller” was more than a great album — it was a phenomenon. It featured unlikely guest artists (Van Halen, Paul McCartney, Vincent Price), soft numbers ( “Human Nature”) and infectious dance tracks ( “Wanna Be Startin’ Something”). No wonder it elevated Jackson from star to megastar.

Winner: “Thriller”

Best All-Time Song

• “Michelle,” Beatles (1966)

• “It’s Too Late,” Carole King (1977)

• “Every Breath You Take,” Sting, performed by The Police (1983)

• “Streets of Philadelphia,” Bruce Springsteen (1994)

• “Beautiful Day,” U2 (2000)

You could have nominated probably 40 Beatles songs for Grammys, and all of them, like “Michelle,” would be deserving of hardware. I love how Springsteen was tasked to write a song about a grim topic (AIDS) for the movie “Philadelphia,” and delivered. But “Every Breath” is so dynamic — from that opening snare crack to the seductive bass that drives the music to those stalking lyrics. There are lots of great candidates for this songwriter award, but I give this one to Sting.

Winner: “Every Breath You Take”

Best New Artist of All-Time

• Crosby, Stills & Nash (1969)

• Sade (1985)

• Christina Aguilera (1999)

• Norah Jones (2002)

• John Legend (2005)

I view this category as one that honors an artist that we expect to contribute lots of great stuff in the future. But clearly some Best New Artist winners (Starland Vocal Band comes to mind) didn’t come through. I should probably give this one to Crosby, Stills & Nash, but to be honest I don’t actually own any of their records. Sade, on the other hand, has that smooth, sexy vocal style. And while she’s not as famous as CSN, she’s been consistently good for two decades.

Winner: Sade

Best Male Pop Vocal Performance of All-Time

• Frank Sinatra, “Strangers in the Night” (1966)

• Stevie Wonder, “You Are the Sunshine of My Life” (1973)

• Paul Simon, “Still Crazy After All These Years” (1975)

• Michael Jackson, “Thriller” (1983)

• Phil Collins, “Against All Odds” (1984)

I love that Ole Blue Eyes was still churning out hits even during the peak of the British Invasion. Paul Simon showed he was an even better songwriter as a solo act with “Still Crazy.” And Phil Collins gave us another emotional love song. But Wonder’s entry is an affirmation, a joyous trip through a soul transformation.

Winner: Stevie Wonder

Best Female Pop Vocal Performance of All-Time

• Carole King, “Tapestry” (1971)

• Bonnie Raitt, “Nick of Time” (1989)

• Sheryl Crow, “All I Wanna Do” (1994)

• Annie Lennox, “No More I Love You” (1995)

• Amy Winehouse, “Rehab” (2007)

You might accuse me of choosing Amy Winehouse for this one only as a sorry attempt to look hip as I’m hopelessly aging. And, yeah, there’s that. But the thing that made the horn-heavy “Rehab” so great was that it recalled all those great all-girl soul acts from the day. And sue me — I think it’s a catchy tune.

Winner: Amy Winehouse

Best Pop Vocal Performance By a Duo or Group

• Beatles, “Hard Day’s Night” (1964)

• Eagles, “Lyin’ Eyes” (1975)

• Bee Gees, “How Deep Is Your Love” (1977)

• R.E.M., “Losing My Religion” (1991)

• Coldplay, “Viva La Vida” (2008)

“Losing My Religion” might be the best song in this category, but, hey — the Beatles have to win something here. Even as the mid-60s approached, the Grammys were hesitant to acknowledge rock acts, as artists like Henri Mancini, Tony Bennett and Judy Garland tended to dominate on awards night. But the Beatles — of course—were the first rock act to crack the Grammys.

Winner: The Beatles

Reach Patrick S. Pemberton at 781-7903 or

ppemberton@thetribune news.com.

About comments

Reader comments on SanLuisObispo.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Tribune. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What you should know about comments on SanLuisObispo.com

SanLuisObispo.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. See our full terms of service here.

Here are some rules of the road:

  • Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.
  • Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.
  • Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.
  • Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and leave him a public message.
  • Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.
  • Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.
  • Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.
  • Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Tribune does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at webmaster@thetribunenews.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the username of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to webmaster@thetribunenews.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

Our news, your way

Get breaking news on your cell phone

Sign up for breaking news alerts from SanLuisObispo.com and get the latest news sent to your cell phone via text message.

Type in your cell phone number

( ) -

I accept the terms and conditions (click to view)

Keep your phone handy!

Upon hitting the Sign up! button, you will receive a message with a four-digit code at the end. Enter this number on the next screen and press the Confirm button.

Terms and Conditions:

By signing up for alerts from this site, you are signing up for a program that may include up to 5 SMS text alert(s) per alert category per day. There is no service fee charged per month but your carrier's standard text messaging and other charges may apply. You may stop this subscription service at any time by sending the text message "STOP" to 72737. You must be at least thirteen (13) years of age to use our alert services. If you are between 13 and 17 years old, you agree that you have received parental permission both to complete the registration process and to receive SMS content on your cell phone. For help, send the text message "HELP" to 72737. This service will work with ATT, Verizon, Sprint, Nextel, Alltell, US Cellular, Cincinnati Bell, Boost, Virgin Mobile USA, Celluar South, Telos, Centennial, East Kentucky Network, Cellcom, Immix and Rural Celluar.

Quick Job Search
Top Jobs