When my son, Mike, was learning to ride his first little bicycle, he, of course, fell. I said, Dont worry, after you fall 10 times youll know how to ride.
So he kept trying. But I was wrong; it didnt take him 10 falls.
'); } -->
When my son, Mike, was learning to ride his first little bicycle, he, of course, fell. I said, Dont worry, after you fall 10 times youll know how to ride.
So he kept trying. But I was wrong; it didnt take him 10 falls.
Mikes bike lesson came back to me this week after the Paso Robles City Council voted to try again to raise our water rates. This isnt their 10th try, but they may still succeed.
Tuesday night the council listened to the newest rate proposal from the city staff and consultants. But then the council chose an alternative proposal.
The staff and consultants proposal included a fixed, base charge on every bill. Every household would be charged $10 per month no matter how much water they used. On top of that, every household would be charged for each billing-unit of water they used. (A billing-unit equals 748 gallons.)
The billing-unit charge would be $1.50 each, for the first five units per month, $1.90 each of the next 25 units and $2.40 each for anything above that. Those rates would increase over five years to $3.15, $4 and $5. The proposal also included higher rates for commercial and industrial users.
(Paso currently charges all customers an $18 fixed, base fee and a $1.32 unit charge.)
But when it came time to act Tuesday, the council bypassed the staff and consultants complicated proposal and favored an alternative called the Uniform Pricing Option. It has no fixed, base charge and just a single, unit rate for all customers. Each customers bill would depend entirely on how much water that customer used.
Under that plan the monthly rate for all customers would be $2.50 per unit. That rate would increase over five years to 4.40 per unit.
The report contained sample bills for customers using nine or 13 units per month. Each was cheaper than it would be under the citys present rate or the staff and consultants proposal.
Councilman Fred Strong said customers using 20 units or more would get the high bills. He said he now uses just five units per month, and with the Uniform Pricing Option hed still pay less in five years than he does now.
Councilman Nick Gilman smiled and said, I dont think we should approve this rate to save Fred money on his bill. He added, The uniform option is easiest to understand and justify.
The council chose it unanimously. They will act Feb. 2, on adopting it and starting the Proposition 218 procedures for its final approval.
Contact Phil Dirkx at phild2008@sbcglobal.net or 238-2372.
SanLuisObispo.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. See our full terms of service here.
Here are some rules of the road:
You should also know that The Tribune does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at webmaster@thetribunenews.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.
If you submit a comment, the username of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to webmaster@thetribunenews.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.
About comments
Reader comments on SanLuisObispo.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Tribune. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.