Bracket Challenge
News - Local

Published: Saturday, Oct. 17, 2009

Updated: 3:37 pm Saturday, Oct. 17, 2009

Dalidio foes say court set a bad precedent

They say a standard has been set for ignoring planning rules

| bcuddy@thetribunenews.com
Comments (0) |
Bookmark and Share
Add to My Yahoo! email this story to a friend E-Mail print story Print
Text Size:

tool name

close
tool goes here

Opponents of Measure J, which gave the green light to the Dalidio shopping center, say the state Supreme Court opened the door “for well-funded individuals and special interest groups to circumvent local and statewide planning and safety requirements” by declining to review the 2006 ballot measure.

The state Supreme Court early this week refused to hear an appeal of Measure J, through which county voters approved the center adjacent to Highway 101 just south of San Luis Obispo.

Citizens for Planning Responsibly and the Environmental Center of San Luis Obispo sued to overturn the initiative, which won two-thirds of the vote countywide.

After prevailing in Superior Court, CPR and ECOSLO lost in California’s 2nd District Court of Appeal in Ventura. The state Supreme Court’s refusal to hear the case left that decision — and Measure J — in place.

“The litigation and appeals process in the state is over,” said James McKiernan, attorney for rancher-developer Ernie Dalidio, who owns the 131 acres of agricultural land.

However, the effects of the decision are not, CPR’s Russ Brown wrote in an e-mail.

“The result of Measure J will have ripple effects for municipalities, counties and governing agencies throughout the state” by encouraging end runs around government controls, Brown wrote.

He proclaimed the organization “surprised and disappointed” at the court.

“We believe the petition (for review) has strong merit, and several agencies had voiced their support for review, such as the Aeronautical Division of Caltrans and the city of Carpinteria.”

Brown added that Chief Justice Ronald George’s “widely reported recent comments regarding the extremely negative effects of legislation by initiative gave us hope the court would review our case.”

Brown wrote that “CPR hopes that any project on that land will annex into the city of San Luis Obispo, and that the developers will honor Mr. Dalidio’s 1994 promise to preserve half the land in open space to mitigate the loss of prime agricultural land to development.”

The San Luis Obispo General Plan was updated in 1994 to allow for retail development on the parcel. The Dalidio land is not in the city, but it has been a long-standing goal of city officials to annex it, control its development and reap its sales taxes.

The city approved annexation and development plans for the Dalidio Marketplace during hard-fought City Council meetings and negotiations in 2003 and 2004. But city voters forced the issue onto the ballot in 2005, and voters narrowly denied the marketplace development.

Dalidio then took Measure J to voters throughout the county and won. The 2006 measure rewrote planning rules to allow for 530,000 square feet of retail space, a hotel, housing and other amenities.

About comments

Reader comments on SanLuisObispo.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Tribune. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What you should know about comments on SanLuisObispo.com

SanLuisObispo.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. See our full terms of service here.

Here are some rules of the road:

  • Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.
  • Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.
  • Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.
  • Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and leave him a public message.
  • Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.
  • Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.
  • Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.
  • Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Tribune does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at webmaster@sanluisobispo.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the username of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to webmaster@sanluisobispo.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

Top Jobs
Quick Job Search