Opinion

Opinion  

Posted on Sun, Feb. 03, 2008

tool name

close
tool goes here

Dalidio should not give up despite surprising ruling

Appeal the decision that went against the choice of 65 percent of voters

WebTalk

Regarding, ‘Court nullifies Dalidio initiative of ‘06,’ Feb. 1

A selection of comments from our online readers. Post your own

thoughts at the end of each story at sanluisobispo.com.

A nother strike at freedom in a supposed democracy. There is development all around Mr. Dalidio’s property. He is entitled to develop his and not remain the only dinosaur.

•••

Whether or not you like this decision, Judge Picquet did his constitutional duty … local voters cannot overrule state law.

•••

And if the measure was illegal and against state law, why was it up for a vote?

•••

And they wonder why voter turnout is so low. I’m tired of voting for things that just get overturned.

•••

Well, congratulations downtown merchants and all you NIMBYs. I will now drive up to Paso Robles to go to Target ... and finish the rest of my shopping there as well.

•••

It’s reasonable to allow some sort of development on this property, but it was ridiculous —and apparently unlawful — to push through a project via a screwball countywide initiative and completely bypass the normal planning process.

•••

Any potential revenue the county might see from this development will be consumed 10 times by the cost of the Prado Road overpass. If Ernie would have just been realistic with his development aspirations, he could have built years ago.

•••

Isn’t this what we pay a planning department for? If the property is zoned for development, since when is it appropriate for citizens to say what stores can be put … ?

•••

The city planning department approved this development. A ballot initiative was used to derail this development in the first place.

•••

Yet another reason why we moved to Arizona.

If you’re shaking your head over Ernie Dalidio’s latest setback, you have plenty of company.

Sixty-five percent of the voters in San Luis Obispo County approved the Dalidio Ranch shopping complex in November 2006. Yet one judge’s opinion has overturned that decision. We don’t like the outcome.

We think that Dalidio’s proposal for a mixed-used project just south of the city of San Luis Obispo is the best use for a property that’s already surrounded by urban uses, including a freeway and a shopping center.

We hope the judge’s ruling doesn’t derail the project, and that Ernie Dalidio can find a way to proceed with a development that’s been more than 15 years in the planning.

That said, we respect that Judge Roger Picquet ruled in a manner that he believed to be consistent with the law.

Here’s the gist of that ruling: By going directly to the voters, the applicants sidestepped a state-required review of the project by the Airport Land Use Commission.

That put Measure J beyond the scope of what the local initiative process allows.

Michael Morris, an attorney for Dalidio, called it a “fairly technical reading of the law.”

Of course, attorneys for the other side disagree.

Here’s our take: We recognize that, for the sake of public safety, it’s essential to carefully scrutinize projects proposed near airports. And while we don’t always agree with the decisions of our local Airport Land Use Commission, we accept that it has a job to do.

But here’s what we find hard to swallow: The Dalidio project has been reviewed, many times over, by various boards, commissions and committees — including the Airport Land Use Commission.

In fact, it was at the insistence of the Airport Land Use Commission that plans for more housing at the site were abandoned.

At this point, it’s time to move on, and allow Dalidio to move forward.

The question is how to do that.

The judge’s ruling can be appealed, and that could be the most viable course of action.

Otherwise, Dalidio may well have to go back to the county and start the project review almost from scratch — a process that could take years.

Dalidio has waited long enough. So have 65 percent of voters, many of whom are no doubt feeling that the democratic process has let them down.

Given the stakes, we think an appeal is worth a try.